When we talk about designing in education, many teachers can agree on the difficultness that it implies. To design is the basis of our profession but unfortunately, the most affected one. The reasons, the lack of ideas that tells you how to do it, which procedures to use or in what should we focus on. In the first chapter of understanding by design, Wiggins gives you the parameters to start this designing. The most important statement in this chapter is the fact that teachers should design backwards. For this reason, Chapter 1 gives you the guide to do it well.
One of the important points that Wiggins presents in his book is the error that teachers do when designing. Many teachers believe that while more entertaining is the activity, the more students learn. However, this perception is hardly correct. In fact, many of these activities are in need of a real purpose. Children can be connected completely with the activity for almost the whole class. Unfortunately, looking this “connection or engagement” forward, it is strictly up in the air. It means that it is nothing that brings the activity down to earth. Another common mistake is the misunderstanding of the “Coverage” concept. Teachers are used to talk about coverage indicating that they have seen a certain amount of lessons; however, it does not imply an understanding of anything.
Afterwards, we found the stages of backward design. The first stage is the identification of the target results. what implies all the knowledge that, you want your students will be able to do and performance. Next, we found the determination of acceptable evidence. Here is what teachers will accept to say if students achieve or understood what was taught. Finally, there is the planning of the learning experiences and instructions: the clearness, the understanding and precision of the question to use. The importance of these stages is that they allow you to structure a well backward design, thus, making easier the process of design.
It is important to highlight why backward design is a fact of discussion for teachers. Wiggins explain to us that it is necessary to do this process because it helps teachers to maximize students’ knowledge but more, it lets you to make learning more effective. Finally, it is essential to put under spot the fact that teachers need to focus more on the purpose of the unit and each activity, instead of the methodology itself. It is more worthy to pay attention to what you think is more significant students know more than the how.
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
I also think that it is important to realize of the mistakes teachers make when they design a lesson. Teacher should be aware of the purpose of the lesson and having good expectations of the class.
ResponderEliminarYeah! It is true!!!I have been working with the interactive board at school and teachers think that they can apply any activity that is fun! I do not agree because sometimes the activity is not even related with the lesson.
ResponderEliminarYou bring up a very important point. Entertainment does not mean learning or understanding. I personally think that if teachers want to carry out games, jokes, or dynamic activites, these have to be wery well thought in order to fulfill the objectives and the main purpose of the classroom. They should be everything but meaningless, it is not the idea that students think by the end of the activity: why did we do this for?
ResponderEliminarI think that backward design maximize much more students' skills rather than knowledge. But i agree that the point should be on the effectiveness of this design as a way to encourage students to understand and learn having clear goals.
ResponderEliminarI think it is complex to say that an activity is entertaining and just for that to express that it is effective. First, who can determine that are students, but it does not mean that the class is going to be meaningful or connected with their needs, it could be a distractor element to achieve real and determine goals.
ResponderEliminarI don't agree with you with this idea: "teachers need to focus more on the purpose of the unit and each activity, instead of the methodology itself". Actually, I think they have the same level of importance and what is more, one should be based on the other in order to make the lesson successful.
ResponderEliminarWiggins says that the basis of our profession is planning, because it is there when we work with the identification of the target results, where we want to lead students in order to get understanding.
ResponderEliminarPaulina, yo también me centré en los dos errores que frecuentemente comiten los profesores. Y si hablo con honradez, ¡creo que he tenido ocasiones de cometir los dos! Pero entiendo ahora, como también obviamente lo haces, que necesitamos tener un propósito más profundo que conecte las ideas de la lección. Estoy absolutamente de acuerdo que el diseño al reverse nos ayuda encontrar ese propósito.
ResponderEliminar